Blog #4
The first podcast was called “Summer
Camp.” Of course the title is giving
away most of what the podcast explains.
The point of this podcast is to explain how “camp” is differentiated
from normal life. Everything seems to be
better when they are at camp. No one
understands the gap between camp and normal life. The kids would go home and describe how much
fun they had, and would tell stories of their experiences at camp. When they went home, no one would understand
what was so cool or why they thought it was amusing. The “so what” of this, as described by the
narrator, is what is the difference between fiction and nonfiction. Or in terms of this story: Camp versus
world. Older campers continued to tell their
stories as well in the podcast. This
also affirms the question of fiction versus nonfiction. “the stories you tell
at camp are so funny but once you go home, they give you a look.. like that’s
stupid….when you describe the story.”
This perfectly describes how camp can
be its own world which no one else understands.
The podcast about “Becoming Batman” was formed like a
profile because it focuses on a single subject just like we are going to do for
our second project. The point of this podcast
was to look into the life of a single person or thing and describe the actions
of it. The summer camp podcast was
organized chronologically by talking about the camp at the beginning and then
interviewing people about the subject.
Batman was about a man and a mouse whose stories were also told chronologically. The subjects were introduced and then
described vividly. Throughout the podcasts we hear background music which help
us to put ourselves in the shoes of the storyteller to be in that scene with
them.
My critical question entails ‘How
has the use of technology, particularly cell phones, affected the way we
interact and communicate?’ I have a few
ideas about who I am going to interview and what I want to observe. I might study a group of teenagers in general
and see how they interact in a social setting.
I would possibly observe their phone use to see how often they take out
there phone instead of simply talking, or if things get awkward. Another group I might study would be people at
the Union. I want to watch them eat
lunch and interact. This could be while
they study, or eat, or just make small talk.
All of these things were very hard for me to do without a phone so that
is why I am interested. I am still not
for sure on who I would interview. A
girl I met just lost her phone so I have an idea of interviewing her to see how
her life has changed in the past few days.
All of these things connect to my critical question because phone
distractions cause us to change our personable characteristics. I discussed this idea with a writing
consultant and she thought that this would connect with my first project. She also suggested interviewing a librarian
from the Union who sells phones and technology related merchandise.
I saw a lot of the same major points in your blog as in mine. However much of it was interpreted differently between mine and yours. We perceived the podcast differently, but had some of the same topics. We talked about different details from each of the podcast throughout our blog.
ReplyDeleteMaddie,
ReplyDeleteGreat job reflecting on the podcasts. Your point about fiction vs. nonfiction in the camp one is a great "so what?" I hadn't thought of. You're right, though. I wish you had shared this in class today.